Wildfires like this one in the Stanislaus National Forest could spread into Yosemite if logging operations to thin trees in overgrown forests around the park cease. Photo by Andrew Huff.
As we get a little older, we get a little smarter. We’ve come to the understanding that one thing affects another and that destroying one will destroy both. Gone are the days when forests were clear-cut in big swatches for a more ecologically and economically viable solution of cutting and removing dead and fallen trees to produce a more natural, fire resistant environment. Selective cutting means that fires no longer climb quickly to the top of the vulnerable forest canopy on dead trees and destroy thousands of acres of beautiful forest annually. That’s why the loss of the Sierra Pacific lumber mill in Standard which gets it trees from National Forest and privately owned land surrounding Yosemite could be a major disaster for the Park if a fire were to break out.
Modesto Bee: Ramon Guzman wields a big, loud piece of logging equipment for his delicate task in the woods.
The machine grabs a small tree in an overcrowded stand, shears it off near the ground, and lays it down amid the timber that will be left standing.
Guzman’s work provides raw material for building homes, but he takes pride in something more — the forest he leaves behind.
“You open the trees so the sun is going to the ground,” he said on a July morning deep in the Stanislaus National Forest. “The trees you leave get more air and more water and start growing better.”
Logging advocates say skills such as Guzman’s are vital to forest health in Tuolumne County, and to its economy. They fear what will happen after this month’s closure of the Sierra Pacific Industries sawmill at Standard, once the hub of a booming timber industry.
“There’s an awful lot of people that work in the woods, like I do, that rely on that sawmill,” said Dave Hansen, a private forester working the same logging project as Guzman, just west of Cherry Lake.
The Standard closure, expected to happen Friday, will put 146 mill employees out of work. About that many contract loggers and truckers also will lose their jobs, industry people said.
The loss of these paychecks — more than $20 an hour in many cases — will hit hard in a county struggling with the recession.
The decline in logging could mean increased fuel for wildfires, which could leave barren soil that degrades rivers supplying farms and cities in the Northern San Joaquin Valley. The blazes could burn forested spots where valley residents camp, hike and fish — and where they might like to retire.
“We’ve got a major, major problem on our hands,” said industry forester Chris Conrad at a forum in Sonora in June. “We’re in the middle of the destruction of the American forest of the West.”
Many environmentalists agree that logging could help restore forests that have grown unnaturally dense, though they continue to question some of the industry’s practices.”
Comments
3 responses to “Loss of Sawmill Could Mean Trouble for Yosemite”
Why is it that fire is still fomented as some evil agent? As a volunteer in Pinnacles and forestry student back in the 80s, I learned the important role of fire. You state, “could be a major disaster for the Park if a fire were to break out”. Fire in yosemite would BENEFIT the forests over time, clean the god awful choke on forest floors, and allow our forests to rejuvinate. Sure it would be destructive the first time, but in the end its still better. Look at Yellowstone if you want evidence.
But this, this is as ignorant and out of touch as any statement I have heard, “Gone are the days when forests were clear-cut in big swatches for a more ecologically and economically viable solution of cutting and removing dead and fallen trees to produce a more natural, fire resistant environment.”
Are you blind, or just way out of touch? I live in Tuolumne County and can assure you that clear cutting is FAR from gone. Google map it! Its a click away. I don’t know what he point of this little article is, but it sure isn’t sharing information based on facts, or science.
Are or park managers really this out of touch with the very environment they are charged with administering?
Wow! That’s quite an emotional response Rick. You’re right fire isn’t a bad thing. As we’ve pointed out in soooo many posts. But, if fire reaches the forest canopy it can literally reduce an area to nothing in a matter of minutes and bake the soil so that nothing will grow for years. Most managed fires are kept below the tops of the trees to reduce duff, intrusive vegetation and immature trees. As for the clear cutting, Sierra Pacific is the largest land owner in California and they have the right to clear their own land. Clear cutting National Forest hasn’t been allowed in years however. Take a drive down Cottonwood Road and you’ll see examples of both managed and clear cut areas.
[…] As we get a little older, we get a little smarter. We’ve come to the understanding that one thing affects another and that destroying one will destroy both. Gone are the days when forests were clear-cut in big swatches for a more ecologically and economically viable solution of cutting and removing dead and fallen trees to produce a more Read more at https://yosemiteblog.com/2009/08/09/loss-of-sawmill-could-mean-trouble-for-yosemite/ […]